我们的网站为什么显示成这样?

可能因为您的浏览器不支持样式,您可以更新您的浏览器到最新版本,以获取对此功能的支持,访问下面的网站,获取关于浏览器的信息:

|本期目录/Table of Contents|

竹叶青冈学名评注(PDF)

《广西植物》[ISSN:1000-3142/CN:45-1134/Q]

期数:
2015年01期
页码:
15-19
栏目:
系统与演化植物学
出版日期:
2015-03-27

文章信息/Info

Title:
The comments on the scientific name changes of Quercus neglecta(Schott.)Koidz.
文章编号:
1000-3142(2015)01-0015-05
作者:
杨舒婷1 曹 明2 邓 敏1*
1. 中国科学院上海辰山植物科学研究中心/上海辰山植物园, 上海 201602; 2. 广西壮族自治区 中国科学院 广西植物研究所, 广西 桂林 541006
Author(s):
YANG Shu-Ting1 CAO Ming2 DENG Min1*
1. Shanghai Chenshan Plant Sciences Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences/ Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602, China; 2. Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin 541006, China
关键词:
竹叶青冈 分类 栎属 青冈属
Keywords:
Quercus neglecta Taxonomy Quercus Cyclobalanopsis
分类号:
Q949.71
DOI:
10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201311016
文献标识码:
A
摘要:
竹叶青冈为我国南方及中南半岛常绿阔叶林常见树种,为该区域的重要材用树种。中国植物志中文版采用Cyclobalanopsis bambusifolia(Hance)Chun ex Y.C. Hsu & H. W. Jen作为其学名,但是基源名Quercus bambusifolia Hance由于错误鉴定1857年并未合格发表,随后基于同一模式和不同的模式,这一种加词先后多次被发表,其中涉及多个裸名、晚出同名、新名称、新组合,学名变化复杂,但其正确学名在国际权威植物分类数据库中并未采纳,正确学名在生态学等研究中亦未采用。因此,对竹叶青冈而言,其学名还存在众多疑问。为了澄清该种的学名,作者通过文献考证和标本核实查阅,对竹叶青冈学名变更历史进行追溯并根据最新的《藻类、真菌、植物国际命名法规》(简称墨尔本法规)对各变更学名进行了评述。本研究结果支持Q. neglecta(Schott.)Koidz作为竹叶青冈正确的学名。但由于国内植物学名仍以中国植物志为主要依据,而中国植物志仍采用狭义栎属Quercus s.s.的概念,为避免造成更多学名混乱,竹叶青冈的学名可沿用中国植物志英文版中学名Cyclobalanopsis neglecta,但中文版所采用C. bambusifolia为错误学名,应该弃用。
Abstract:
Quercus neglecta(Schottky)Koidz. is native to southern China and northern Indo-china. It is an important timber woods and key tree species in this region. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae used Cyclobalanopsis bambusifolia(Hance)Chun ex Y.C. Hsu & H. W. Jen as its scientific name. However,based on our study on the original prologue and herbarium collections,this name was not correct,because its basionym Quercus bambusifolia Hances(1875)was not valid published,due to the misidentification and it was put as a synonym. Over the following years,the species epithet “bambusifolia” was published several times based on the same and different type specimens,then later transferred to genus Cyclobalanopsis at different times to establish several new combinations. As a result,the scientific name changes of this species were extremely complicated. Currently,the correct scientific name is still not adopted by the key plant taxonomic database,nor properly used in current ecological and forestry studies. Great confusion over the scientific names are still exists on this species. In order to clarify its scientific name confusion,we traced the name changes of this species in this study,and evaluated and clarified each name even applied to the taxa according to the latest “International Code of Nomenclature for algae,fungi,and plants(Melbourne Code)”. Our study demonstrated Q. neglecta (Schott.)Koidz should be the correct scientific name. However,most researchers in China are generally adapted to the narrow genus definition of Quercus(as Quercus s.s.)and Cyclobalanopsis was recognized as an independent genus in Flora of China and Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. In order to avoid the confusion in the future,the name C. neglecta applied in Flora of China should be served as its formal scientific name,but the name C. bambusifolia in Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae is illegal,and should be abandoned.

参考文献/References

Deng M(邓敏). 2007. Anatomy,Taxonomy,Distribution & Phylogeny of Quercus subg. Cyclobalanopsis(Oersted)Schneid.(Fagaceae)(壳斗科栎属青冈亚属的形态解剖、分类、分布及其系统演化)[D]. Kunming(昆明):Kunming Institute of Botany,Chinese Academy of Sciences(中国科学院昆明植物研究所)
Deng M(邓敏),Song YG(宋以刚),Li QJ(李全健),et al. 2013. Pollen morphology of Quercus subg. Cyclobalanopsis(Fagaceae)and its systematic implication[J]. Guihaia(广西植物),33(3):368-375
Fortune R. 1860. Notes onsome Chinese plants recently introduced to England[J]. Gardeners’ Chron & Agric Gaz:169-170 Govaerts R,Frodin DG. 1998. Worldchecklist and Bibliography of Fagales(Betulaceae,Corylaceae,Fagaceae and Ticodendraceae)[M]. London:the Royal Botanic Gardens,Kew:201-204
Huang CC(黄成就),Chang YT(张永田),Hsu YC(徐永椿),et al. 1998. Fagaceae(壳斗科)[M]// Chun WY(陈焕镛),Huang CC(黄成就). Fl. Reip. Pop. Sin.(中国植物志). Beijing(北京):Science Press(科学出版社),22:280
Huang CC,Chang YT,Bartholomew B. 1999. Fagaceae[M]//Wu CY,Raven PH. Flora of China. Beijing and St. Louis:Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press:380-400
Hance HF. 1875. Analecta dryographica:descriptions of a few new,and notes on some imperfectly known east-asiatic corylaceae[J]. J Bot,13:364
Koidzumi G. 1916. On the Classification of CastaneaceaeⅡ[J]. Bot Mag Tokyo,30:201
Long WX(龙文兴),Yang XB(杨小波),Li DH(李东海),et al. 2008. Quantitative vegetation classification of Qichai Region in Hainan Island(海南七差地区植被数量分类)[J]. J Wuhan Bot Res(武汉植物学研究),26(1):41-46
Manos PS,Doyle JJ,Nixon KC. 1999. Phylogeny,biogeography,and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus subgenus Quercus(Fagaceae)[J]. Mol Phylogenet Evol,12(3):333-349
Masters MT. 1874. New evergreen oaks[J].Gard Chor:632 McNeill J,Barrie FR,Buck WR,et al. 2012. International code of nomenclature for algae,fungi,and plants(Melbourne Code)adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress,Melbourne,Australia(2011)[G]. Koeltz Scientific Books Oh S,Manos PS. 2008. Molecular phylogenetics and cupule evolution in Fagaceae as inferred from nuclear CRABS CLAW sequences[J].Taxon:434-451
Pu CX(普春霞),Zhou ZK(周浙昆),Luo Y(罗艳). 2002. A cladistic analysis of Quercus(Fagaceae)in China based on leaf epidermis and architecture [J]. Acta Bot Yunnan(云南植物研究),24(6):689-698
Seemann B. 1857. The Botany of the Voyage of H.M.S.Herald:Under the Command of Captain Henry Kellett,R.N.,C.B.,during the Years 1845-51[M]. London:Lovell Reeve:John Edwards Taylor,Little Queen Street,Lincoln’s Inn Fields:415
Schottky E. 1912. Die Eichen des extratropischen Ostasiens und ihre pflanzengeographische Bedeutung[J].Bot J Syst,47:657
Wang BS(王伯荪),Zhang WY(张炜银),Zhang JL(张军丽). 2001. Local and vertical distribution of floristic composition species in tropicalmontane rain forests,Hainan Island(海南岛热带山地雨林种类组成的局域分布与垂直分布)[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol(应用生态学报),12(05):641-647
Wang RJ(王瑞江),Wang Z(王忠),Luo YY(罗燕燕),et al. 2009. Fagaceae(壳斗科)[M]// Wu DL(吴德邻). Fl. Guangdong(广东植物志). Guangzhou(广州):Guangdong Science and Technology Press(广东科技出版社),9:49
Xu YC(徐永椿),Ren XW(任宪威). 1993. New combinations of Quercus and Cyclobalanopsis from China(栎属和青冈属的新组合)[J]. J Forest Univ(北京林业大学学报),15(4):44-46
Yi GL(易观路),Xu FH(许方宏),Luo JH(罗建华),et al. 2004. A primary observation on breeding seedlings and afforestation effects of 7 species of Magnoliaceae plants(壳斗科七种树种育苗及造林效果初步观测)[J]. Guizhou For Sci Technol(贵州林业科技),32(1):31-34

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2014-04-12修回日期: 2014-07-13
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(31270267,31100154,30960040); 上海市教育委员会科研创新项目(12YZ157); 上海市绿化市容管理局攻关课题(F112419,F132417,G102405)。
作者简介: 杨舒婷(1984-),女,浙江温州人,博士,助理研究员,从事植物资源与系统学研究,(E-mail)shootingy@163.com。 *通讯作者: 邓敏,博士,副研究员,从事植物分类及系统学研究,(E-mail)dengmin@sibs.ac.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-03-08